Rivian explains why its EVs will never embrace Apple CarPlay, but conveniently omits the real reason

Opinion: Do EV manufacturers simply want your data instead?

When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission.Here’s how it works.

After months of debate, Rivian CEO RJ Scaringe recently toldThe Verge’sDecoder podcastthat the door forAppleCarPlay integration in the company’s vehicles has been well and truly closed.

Like Tesla, Rivian wants to forge its own path when it comes to the in-vehicle user experience, leaning on its in-house software engineers to “fully capture every feature that’s in CarPlay,” according to the man himself.

“We just believe that it’s such an important piece of real estate, the digital ecosystem, that it was something we want to retain,” Scaringe went on to tellDecoderhost Nilay Patel.

But overarching public opinion seems to go against this notion. DuringWWDC 2022, Apple’s former engineering manager Emily Schubert said that 79 per cent of US buyers would only buy a car if it supported CarPlay.

Sure, that might just be Apple blowing an Apple-shaped trumpet, but internal research by Porsche also revealed an “overwhelming” number of its customers use iPhones and demanded more functionality within the Apple ecosystem when driving their cars.

As a result, Porsche is among the first toallow Apple to integrate deeperinto the UI of its upcoming vehicles.

So why is Rivian running away from it? RJ Scaringe claims CarPlay doesn’t have deep enough capabilities to leverage other parts of the vehicle experience. In other words, drivers would have to exit the CarPlay ecosystem to, for example, open the ‘frunk’.

Get the best Black Friday deals direct to your inbox, plus news, reviews, and more.

Sign up to be the first to know about unmissable Black Friday deals on top tech, plus get all your favorite TechRadar content.

But this begs the question: why not just have a physical button inside the cabin that does this? Car designers will claim it “declutters” an interior and leads to a more visually appealing space, while those in charge of manufacturing will attest to the fact it saves complication and therefore money.

However, this drive for ever-more software within vehicles (particularly from those Californian tech start-ups) often feels like a personal quest, rather than a consumer-facing decision.

Astudy by WhatCar?in the UK found that nine out of 10 motorists preferred a car with physical buttons, rather than everything committed to touchscreen.

This is a painful point thatVolkswagen was forced to take on boardwhen it received serious backlash from customers and reviewers, as they rallied against its early ID range of electric vehicles and their distinct – and often frustrating – lack of physical buttons.

EvenEuro NCAP, which is the leading expert in crash safety for European car manufacturers, says that it will start punishing OEMs for committing too much vehicle functionality to screen, citing the fact that it is distracting and dangerous.

Cars aren’t phones

Until true SAE Level 5 driverless cars become a reality, the automobile as we know it isn’t a smartphone on wheels – no matter how much modern manufacturers try and tell you it is.

As the law (and common sense) sees it, we still need to be in control and not texting, firing off Instagram posts or bingeing a boxset. However, data is the next big revenue stream for car companies, which is why so many of them are hellbent on keeping drivers within their own software ecosystems.

Why should Apple andGoogleget an insight into your every move, when Rivian and Tesla can leverage that information for financial gain?

It is true that manufacturers, particularly those of today’s EVs, can offer more detailed functionality when drivers embrace their software, with the likes of Tesla able to reveal how busy its Supercharger sites are when drivers choose to use the company’s mapping, for example.

But for so many drivers, the smartphones in their pockets already host the best mapping, podcast, entertainment and communication tools for daily use, so most simply want to mirror that experience. Ferrari isn’teven bothering to develop its in-house navigationany more.

Apple CarPlay, to cite just one example, is already offering much deeper vehicle functionality into its ecosystem, so should theoretically negate the need for users to jump in and out of two different interfaces to control important vehicle features.

That said, what’s wrong with just having a physical button or dial to control the lights and adjust the air-con… or in Rivian’s case, open the frunk?

You might also like

Leon has been navigating a world where automotive and tech collide for almost 20 years, reporting on everything from in-car entertainment to robotised manufacturing plants. Currently, EVs are the focus of his attentions, but give it a few years and it will be electric vertical take-off and landing craft. Outside of work hours, he can be found tinkering with distinctly analogue motorcycles, because electric motors are no replacement for an old Honda inline four.

I fell in love with the cute and compact Hyundai Inster, but it has one major drawback

The 6 best electric motorcycle concepts and launches from EICMA 2024

Your next smartwatch could be battery-free – and powered by your skin